A fast-growing innovator in next-generation construction materials set out to deliver a transformative capital project; a critical milestone in their mission to reshape the industry with lower-carbon solutions. The facility represented one of the largest capital investments ever undertaken in the sector, with a total installed cost in the hundreds of millions. For a startup, managing an investment of this magnitude was a defining moment: every decision carried amplified impact, with millions at stake in scope, cost, and schedule.
As the newly formed project team transitioned from FEL-2 to FEL-3 (Front-End Engineering Design), they issued an extensive RFP for Engineering, Procurement, and Construction (EPC) partners, listing more than 500 deliverables. While comprehensive, this approach risked driving unintended consequences such as unnecessary scope, inflated bids, and diluted project priorities.
The underlying risk: in projects of this scale, overspecification can quietly erode competitiveness and stall innovation, since EPCs typically price and deliver every requested item, regardless of true necessity or value.
Long-term capability uplift: The client team gained valuable skills in FEL discipline, embedding capital efficiency into their future project playbook.
For capital-intensive, first-of-a-kind projects, overspecification is a hidden drain quietly inflating costs and slowing innovation. This case shows how right-sizing scope at FEL-2/FEL-3 creates value that rivals entire future phases of growth. With a people-first, business-driven approach, BPMP helps ensure that every project dollar advances real business value, not wasted effort.
First-of-a-kind projects are high-stakes: every scope decision has amplified impact.
Capital Decision Readiness References (FEL 2–3)
Reference checklists used to support FEL and capex decisions.
(from The Industrial Capital Project Playbook)